Climate MattersFebruary 15, 2023

Winter Chill Brings Summer Fruit

KEY CONCEPTS

NEW: Check the Climate Matters Editorial Calendar to see what we’ll cover in the weeks ahead.

CM: Chill Matters 2023 (EN)
Click the downloadable graphic: Chill Matters

Winter chill brings summer fruits

Many temperate fruit and nut trees need a period of winter chill in order to produce flowers and fruit each year. 

Without enough sustained chilling, the timing of bud break and pollination, and the quality or yield of fruit may be compromised.

Winter chill is therefore key to non-citrus fruit and nut production—a $27 billion industry in the U.S. 

But winters are the fastest-warming season in most U.S. locations. Warmer, shorter winters can disrupt the chilling requirement that fruit and nut crops—and related local economies—depend on.

CM: Local Chill Trends 2023 (EN)
Click the downloadable graphic: Local Chill Trends

Calculating chill

Winter chill generally refers to a period of cold temperatures above freezing, but there are several different ways to calculate chill accumulation.  

The required chilling period also varies both among species (e.g., apples, peaches, almonds) and among cultivars of a species (e.g., Red Delicious, Gala, and thousands of other apple varieties). 

Winter warm spells—such as those experienced in January 2023 across the eastern U.S. and northern Plains—can offset previous chilling.   

This damaging weather whiplash is reflected in an alternate metric called chill portions—a more accurate measure of chill accumulation in fruit and nut trees. 

Local chill trends

Climate Central used chill portions (see Methodology) to analyze trends in annual chill accumulation in 215 U.S. locations from 1980 (or the next earliest year with hourly data) to 2022.

181 (84%) of the 215 locations have experienced a long-term decrease in winter chill since 1980. 

But chill trends matter most where fruits and nuts are grown, so below we take a closer look at chill trends in the places that grow the 10 most valuable non-citrus fruit and nut crops in the U.S. 

The following discussion focuses on analyzed locations within top-producing counties for each crop. 

Fruits and nuts: the big five

Of all non-citrus fruits and nuts grown in the U.S., the top five account for $20 billion—or 74% of all non-citrus fruits and nuts ($26.8 billion), according to USDA data. The big five are:

1. Grapes—including table and wine grapes—are a $5.5 billion dollar industry, accounting for 21% of all non-citrus fruits and nuts grown in the U.S. 

2. Almonds—a close second to grapes—are a $5 billion dollar industry in the U.S. 

3. Strawberries grown in the U.S. are a $3.4 billion industry—of which California produces 88%.

4. Apples grown in the U.S. are a $3 billion industry—of which Washington grows 72%. 

5. Pistachios grown in the U.S. are a $2.9 billion industry, following close behind apples. 

Top 10 fruits and nuts

The local value of fruit and nuts is all relative. For smaller states, growing high-value fruit and nut crops is a major economic engine. Here, we look at chill trends in places that produce the other top 10 crops:

6. Blueberries are a $1.1 billion industry in the U.S., distributed across:

7. Walnuts are a $1 billion industry in the U.S., with 100% produced in California’s Central Valley, where places such as Bakersfield and Fresno have experienced decreasing chill.

8. Cherries are a $950 million industry in the U.S.—and Washington (Yakima) accounts for 50%. 

9. Peaches—a $624 million industry in the U.S.—are grown throughout the country, from California to New Jersey and from Michigan to Georgia. 

10. Pecans are a $550 million industry in the U.S.

LOCAL STORY ANGLES

How are local growers adapting to changing chill—now and into the future?

The USDA’s annual Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook gives a national overview of forecasted growing conditions during the current season, including potential chill-related challenges for specific crops and regions. Options for adapting to decreasing or unreliable winter chill also include breeding or planting low-chill cultivars. Researchers are also improving dormancy and chilling forecasting models to more accurately inform growers on seasonal timescales. Other research looks decades into the future, using climate models to explore chill accumulation scenarios over the coming decades in key growing states and regions including Georgia, the Pacific Northwest, and California

What are the chilling requirements for specific crops in your local area, and how are they changing?

USDA’s interactive Farm Income Atlas quickly maps and compares the state-level economic impact of different crops, including dozens of fruits and nuts. The UC Davis Fruit & Nut Research & Information Center provides detailed tree crop chilling data for California fruit and nut growers, including crop-specific chilling models. UC Merced’s interactive Climate Mapper tool can be used to map projected future cold hardiness (at state and county levels) over the contiguous U.S. and projected future growing conditions for perennial crops across the western U.S. Contact agricultural extension agents at your nearest Land-Grant University for more detailed local information.

CONTACT EXPERTS

Lauren E. Parker, PhD (she/her)
Research Program Manager
USDA California Climate Hub
Related expertise: Climate change impacts on fruit production
Contact: leparker@ucdavis.edu

FIND EXPERTS

Submit a request to SciLine from the American Association for the Advancement of Science or to the Climate Data Concierge from Columbia University. These free services rapidly connect journalists to relevant scientific experts. 

Browse maps of climate experts and services at regional NOAA, USDA, and Department of the Interior offices.  

Explore databases such as 500 Women Scientists, BIPOC Climate and Energy Justice PhDs, and Diverse Sources to find and amplify diverse expert voices. 

Reach out to your State Climate Office or the nearest Land-Grant University to connect with scientists, educators, and extension staff in your local area. 

METHODOLOGY

Many chilling models have been developed; all are empirical proxies of actual chill experienced by fruit and nut trees. One of these chilling models, the Dynamic Model, calculates the annual accumulation of chill portions in a two-step process. In the first step, the reversible accumulation and destruction of chill is temporarily tallied based on hour-by-hour temperature fluctuations within or above an ideal chilling range. When a critical amount of temporary and reversible chill accumulates in the first step, it is permanently and irreversibly counted toward the annual total chill portions in a second step. Over the annual dormancy period, chill portions accumulate in this dynamic, two-step process.

The chill portions analysis was based on hourly GHCN temperature data accessed through ACIS. Data was retrieved beginning in 1981, however the full set was not available for many stations. There are also fewer stations collecting hourly data than daily data, resulting in a smaller set (215 total locations) than most of Climate Matters analyses. The calculation of chill portions was performed using the chillR package for the R programming  language. chillR includes a function that calculates the chill portion based on the complex Dynamic Model of chilling. For this analysis, Climate Central used the base function and did not make any adjustments based on local factors. An analysis of particular crops would require making some of these model adjustments to properly capture the chill needs of specific crop or cultivar.