Climate MattersApril 9, 2025

More Extreme Heat in National Parks

KEY CONCEPTS

This Climate Matters analysis is based on open-access data from the National Park Service. See Methodology for details.

Warming climate, warming parks

National Park Week kicks off on April 19, when park entrance fees will be waived. The entire week is about exploring and celebrating the more than 400 treasured sites across the National Park System.

Among these, the 63 national parks are the most iconic and popular, hosting over 94 million (28%) of the record total 331.9 million visitors across the entire National Park System in 2024. Recreation visits last year peaked in July — the hottest time of year for much of the U.S. 

As our climate warms due to heat-trapping pollution, national parks are warming too, putting their invaluable cultural, ecological, geologic, and educational resources — and their millions of visitors — at risk. 

In fact, the combined area of the National Park System has warmed twice as fast as the U.S. as a whole from 1895 to 2010 — reflecting that much of the total park area is located in environments that are especially sensitive to climate change, including the Arctic, mountains, and arid regions.

As park managers decide how to adapt park operations to our changing climate, they look to scientific assessments to understand how climate change is likely to alter conditions in each park.

CM: More Extreme Heat in National Parks 2025 (EN)
Click the downloadable graphic: More Extreme Heat in National Parks

A hotter future in every national park

In 2024, the National Park Service published a set of reports assessing how average temperatures, heat and precipitation extremes, and drought are likely to change in each park over the coming decades. 

The reports analyze a range of future scenarios for each park to guide planning and adaptation efforts on the ground (see Methodology for details). 

The assessments find that all 63 national parks will continue to warm into the future — leading to more extreme heat. 

Here, an extremely hot day is defined as having a maximum temperature above the historical (1979-2012) 99th percentile. In other words, an extremely hot day is at least as hot as the hottest 1% of all days experienced in that park during the recent past.

According to data from the National Park Service reports, the 25 most-visited national parks in the contiguous U.S. — with more than 77 million visitors — are likely to experience a nearly five-fold increase, on average, in extremely hot days per year by 2050 compared to the recent past (1979-2012). 

National park

2024 visits (recreational)

99th percentile temperature (°F), 1979-2012

Annual days above 99th percentile temperature

1979-2012

2050 (warm wet scenario)

2050 (hot dry scenario)

Great Smoky Mountains

                            12,191,834

83.4

3

23

50

Zion

                                        4,946,592

92.4

4

21

46

Grand Canyon

                                        4,919,163

101.0

4

16

36

Yellowstone

                                        4,744,353

79.6

4

15

39

Rocky Mountain

                                        4,154,349

74.9

4

22

46

Yosemite

                                        4,121,807

77.6

4

26

48

Acadia

                                        3,961,661

85.9

3

14

26

Olympic

                                        3,717,267

73.6

4

12

20

Grand Teton

                                        3,628,222

84.8

4

21

43

Glacier

                                        3,208,755

78.2

3

13

33

Joshua Tree

                                        2,991,874

102.4

3

15

28

Cuyahoga Valley

                                        2,912,454

91.7

4

18

40

Indiana Dunes

                                        2,705,209

93.5

4

11

32

Gateway Arch

                                        2,563,052

99.0

4

13

37

Bryce Canyon

                                        2,498,075

88.2

3

10

27

Hot Springs

                                        2,461,812

103.2

4

11

29

Shenandoah

                                        1,720,211

90.9

4

17

35

Mount Rainier

                                        1,620,006

76.4

4

12

21

Arches

                                        1,466,528

101.0

3

21

41

Death Valley

                                        1,440,484

96.9

3

16

37

Capitol Reef

                                        1,422,490

94.2

4

23

39

Sequoia

                                        1,309,573

68.4

4

24

48

Badlands

                                        1,094,245

100.7

3

11

25

Saguaro

                                            946,369

94.2

4

19

35

Canyonlands

                                            818,492

103.0

4

22

39

It’s important to note that the estimates above represent a “warm wet” scenario at the low end of the range of projected warming assessed by the National Park Service (see Methodology for details). 

Heat risks in national parks

Extreme heat is dangerous for everyone, everywhere. But especially in the national parks, where more extremely hot days can impact visitor health and safety.

CM: Humid Heat Impacts Health 2023 (EN)
Click the downloadable graphic: Humid Heat Impacts Health

Heat risks can compound for national park visitors because the parks tend to be located in extreme environments and host millions of domestic and international visitors annually, who may not be adapted (either physically or in terms of their behavior) to physical exertion and outdoor recreation in such environments. 

According to National Park Service analysis, national park visits are closely linked to temperature: 

More visits put additional pressure on warming parks and potentially put more visitors at risk of experiencing heat-related health and safety problems.

Across the 63 national parks, the weather conditions suited to safe outdoor recreation (based on wet bulb globe temperature) have become less frequent from 1984 to 2019, according to a 2024 study.

A 2023 study found that rates of heat-related illness among visitors to Grand Canyon National Park (the third-most-visited park in 2024) increased significantly with higher daily maximum temperatures. These links were strongest during the shoulder seasons (spring and fall), when visitors may not expect dangerous extreme heat that is nevertheless becoming more common. 

Extreme heat also puts wildlife, ecosystems, and infrastructure at risk across the National Park System. 

CM: Climate Change Impacts National Parks 2025 (EN)
Click the downloadable graphic: Climate Change Impacts National Parks

Parks responding to climate change

In response to rising heat risks, Grand Canyon National Park and other parks are taking additional steps to protect visitors, such as providing water filling stations, shade structures, emergency preparedness, and informing visitors about hazards from heat and other climate-related conditions. 

The National Park Service Climate Change Response Strategy is the foundation for park-specific efforts to understand how climate change affects parks, adapt to those changes, mitigate the root causes, and communicate the effects to the public. 

The National Park Service is already adapting to current and expected future changes brought by warming. Documented examples of changes due mainly to human-caused climate change include:

Park-specific adaptation planning is informed by science-based scenarios covering the range of conditions that individual parks could experience in a warmer future. 

These adaptation plans aim to promote ecosystem resilience, preserve cultural heritage, and protect critical facilities and infrastructure. 

Future Warming Choices in National Parks - Our Changing National Parks
Click the downloadable graphic: Future Warming Choices in National Parks

Future warming choices for national parks

Beyond adapting to current and future change, rapidly reducing heat-trapping pollution is ultimately the most impactful action to slow the rate of warming and ease mounting stress on park resources and visitors. 

According to a 2022 Climate Central analysis, the choices we make during this decade could lead to very different outcomes for parks.

By 2100, annual average temperatures across 62 national parks could warm between 5.5°F and 11.0°F compared to the 1991-2020 baseline — depending on how quickly we reduce heat-trapping pollution.

These levels of warming mean that future generations could inherit national parks that are altogether different from those enjoyed today.

LOCAL STORY ANGLES

What other climate risks are national parks facing?

With over 400 park units across the National Park Service, parks are facing a wide range of climate risks. 

How are national parks adapting to climate change?

The National Park Service uses scenario planning to prepare for a range of likely future conditions in parks. For more information on scenario planning and examples of it in action at individual parks, check out the Climate Change Scenario Planning Showcase. Strategic decision-making about the future of park resources is also informed by the resist–accept–direct framework.

​​The National Park Service also includes 18 Research Learning Centers across the U.S. that support scientific research, education, and science-based visitor experiences. The National Park Service also manages a range of datasets, maps, publications, and other resources to support the science of our changing parks. 

CONTACT EXPERTS

Patrick Gonzalez, Ph.D.
currently: Associate Adjunct Professor, University of California, Berkeley
formerly: Principal Climate Change Scientist, U.S. National Park Service
Related expertise: climate change observed impacts, projected risks, and carbon solutions in U.S. national parks
Contact: patrickgonzalez@berkeley.edu

Christopher Craig, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Murray State University
Related expertise: weather-related safety in national parks
Contact: ccraig8@murraystate.edu

Erin Seekamp, Ph.D.
Goodnight Distinguished Professor in Coastal Resilience and Sustainability
Executive Director, NC State Climate and Sustainability Academy
North Carolina State University
Related expertise: Climate adaptation planning
Contact: elseekam@ncsu.edu

FIND EXPERTS

Submit a request to SciLine from the American Association for the Advancement of Science or to the Climate Data Concierge from Columbia University. These free services rapidly connect journalists to relevant scientific experts. 

Explore databases such as 500 Women Scientists, BIPOC Climate and Energy Justice PhDs, and Diverse Sources to find and amplify diverse expert voices. 

Reach out to your State Climate Office or the nearest Land-Grant University to connect with scientists, educators, and extension staff in your local area. 

METHODOLOGY

Visitation data for national parks in 2024 refers to recreation visits and comes from the National Park Service Visitor Use Statistics Program and can be accessed through the Integrated Resource Management Applications (IRMA) Portal.

The historical (1979-2012) and projected future (2050) frequency of extremely hot days in national parks (in the contiguous U.S.) are from the Park-specific Climate Futures reports published by the National Park Service Climate Change Response Program in 2024. 

A methods report (Runyon et al., 2024) describes the analytical approach in detail. This Climate Matters brief refers to 2050 projections for the “warm wet” and “hot dry” climate futures scenarios, using the quadrant-average approach described in Runyon et al. (2024). The “warm wet” and “hot dry” scenarios are two of the four total divergent scenarios assessed in the Park-specific Climate Futures reports and used for scenario-based adaptation in parks. Across the national parks, the “warm wet” scenario generally represents the lower end of projected average warming and extreme heat frequencies. The “hot dry” scenario generally represents the upper end of these projections. 

Note that the Park-specific Climate Futures reports use CMIP5 data (see Runyon et al., 2024 and FAQs for details). The park-specific 2022 Climate Central analysis cited in this brief uses CMIP6 data (see linked brief for detailed methodology).